VeriTask is a research and verification workspace for teams who are tired of fake numbers, made-up sources, and decisions built on screenshots. Every claim gets a traceable origin. Every number can be re-checked in one click.
VeriTask makes it harder to publish a number without a source than to publish one with one. That's the entire product.
Every claim must link to a source document, page, and figure. The interface won't let you publish a number without one. No "we'll add the link later."
When you cite a source, VeriTask opens it. We never invent synthetic or placeholder data to fill a chart — if a study is missing, the field says "no data" and the chart shows the gap.
Sensitive claims require a second reviewer. The reviewer must physically re-open the source and confirm the citation. We log the click, the time, and the user.
Every claim, edit, and verification is logged. The log is append-only — no one can quietly rewrite a number after it's been published.
Charts refuse to render until enough real, verified data points exist. We won't smooth, interpolate, or guess to make a slide deck look complete.
If your research is missing a critical data point, VeriTask shows you — not after the meeting, but in the editor, in red, the moment you try to publish.
The discipline of "cite, verify, publish" becomes natural — and your future self, your auditors, and your customers will all be grateful.
Write the claim in plain language. The editor pre-checks the wording for vagueness or unprovable phrasing.
Link a specific document, page, and figure. VeriTask opens it; you confirm the citation matches what the document actually says.
A teammate re-opens the source and confirms the citation independently. The reviewer cannot just check a box.
The claim enters the public log with its sources, its reviewer, and its verification timestamp. Anyone can re-check it.
Verifying claims is the baseline. We will never charge for it as an add-on.
Any document or dataset you can link to — a PDF, a published paper, a verified dataset, a meeting transcript, an internal report. The source must be accessible to the reviewers; we do not allow "trust me, I saw it" citations.
We use AI to surface the relevant section of a source quickly, but verification is done by humans. The reviewer physically confirms that the cited claim matches the cited text. The system then logs the reviewer's identity and the time.
The claim is marked "needs re-verification" and the audit trail records both the original and the corrected citation. The original is preserved — never silently overwritten.
Yes, but only verified members of your workspace can review it. We support redactions for sensitive information in the cited page.
Yes — every workspace has a public endpoint that returns the latest signed verification state. Auditors and customers can re-check the chain in real time.
Disagreements are part of the audit trail. A claim can be marked "in dispute," which freezes its public status until a third reviewer weighs in. Nothing is forced through.
Free for individuals. Free to try for teams. No credit card, no demo, no fake numbers — obviously.